Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Holger Rune vs Marco Cecchinato Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rune vs Cecchinato analysis and find out who is favored!
Holger Rune vs Marco Cecchinato Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rune 1 - 0 Cecchinato
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rune has won 54.95% of points on their second serve, while Cecchinato has won 49.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rune, in recent form, has won 49.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cecchinato has won 51.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.58% and 34.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rune has saved 68.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cecchinato has saved 59.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rune has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Cecchinato winning 34.15% (W/L 14/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35). Cecchinato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 444/ 275), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9), where as Cecchinato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.38% of matches (W/L 12/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rune winning 1 times and Cecchinato being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rune winning 2 and Cecchinato winning 0. The last match between Rune and Cecchinato was at the San Marino Challenger, 14-08-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Holger Rune getting the victory 7-5 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rune and Cecchinato have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rune winning 0 times and Cecchinato 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rune winning 1, and Cecchinato 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rune has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.77 while Cecchinato has played against players with an average rank of 328.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rune has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cecchinato has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rune has converted 33.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cecchinato has converted 46.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
13
Rank
4
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
403
Rank
16
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
66% (227-116)
Career Total W/L
57% (486-369)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
45% (13-16)
$6,013,560
Career Prize Money
$2,233,276
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rune VS Cecchinato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Holger Rune | Marco Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:24 | 1:58:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (47/76) | 56% (45/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (29/47) | 62% (28/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (18/29) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (35/81) | 38% (29/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rune VS Cecchinato H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Holger Rune
Player
Marco Cecchinato
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Holger Rune | Marco Cecchinato |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 45% (13/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (53/31) | 46% (29/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (438/401) | 50% (288/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 48% (13/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 203 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:47 | 1:39:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.91 | 356.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1559/2580) | 65% (1271/1957) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1145/1559) | 65% (822/1271) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (561/1021) | 49% (337/686) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (69/208) | 46% (83/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (913/2553) | 41% (748/1821) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (12/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (12/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (18/27) | 45% (13/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (16/18) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 6% (17/1) |
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | 7-5 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Flavio Cobolli
52%
(
79 of
152)
1st Serve %
54%
(
94 of
173)
3
Aces
14
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
70 of
94)
58%
(
42 of
73)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
34%
(
52 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
63 of
173)
163
Total Points Won
162
|
6-4 6-3 3-6 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Luca Nardi
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Holger Rune
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
86 of
131)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Cecchinato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Marco Cecchinato
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Lukas Neumayer
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Marco Cecchinato
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Marco Cecchinato
78%
(
90 of
115)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
56 of
89)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
49 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(9) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Rune Vs Cecchinato Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Holger Rune
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
